From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Centeno

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 15, 2001
255 Conn. 950 (Conn. 2001)

Opinion

Decided March 15, 2001


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 61 Conn. App. 906 (AC 20184), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, with respect to the question of whether one of the jurors and the defendant knew each other from a prior, possibly criminal relationship, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in not inquiring or investigating further?"

The Supreme Court docket number is S.C. 16494.

Joseph Visone, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Michele C. Lukban, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Centeno

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Mar 15, 2001
255 Conn. 950 (Conn. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Centeno

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v . THOMAS CENTENO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Mar 15, 2001

Citations

255 Conn. 950 (Conn. 2001)
769 A.2d 61

Citing Cases

In re Luis N.

(Emphasis added.) Citing In re Ashley S., 61 Conn.App. 658, 667, 769 A.2d 718 cert. denied, 255 Conn. 950,…

State v. Centeno

We granted his petition, limited to the following issue: "Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that,…