From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Castillo

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 18, 2016
792 S.E.2d 784 (N.C. 2016)

Opinion

No. 222P16

08-18-2016

State of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Castillo

Kerstin Walker Sutton, Attorney at Law, Durham, Stephen P. Lindsay, Attorney at Law, for Castillo, Jeffrey. Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.


Kerstin Walker Sutton, Attorney at Law, Durham, Stephen P. Lindsay, Attorney at Law, for Castillo, Jeffrey.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, Roger A. Echols, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 7th of June 2016 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A–30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 7th of June 2016 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 18th of August 2016."


Summaries of

State v. Castillo

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug 18, 2016
792 S.E.2d 784 (N.C. 2016)
Case details for

State v. Castillo

Case Details

Full title:State of North Carolina v. Jeffrey Castillo

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Aug 18, 2016

Citations

792 S.E.2d 784 (N.C. 2016)

Citing Cases

State v. Benton

Reasonable suspicion is a conclusion of law, reviewed de novo. State v. Castillo, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 787…