From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Casanova

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 18, 1999
742 A.2d 359 (Conn. 1999)

Opinion

Decided November 18, 1999


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 54 Conn. App. 714 (AC 17372), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the behavior of police officers was irrelevant to a prosecution under General Statutes § 53a-167c, and therefore preclusion of evidence of same did not violate the defendant's state and federal constitutional rights?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that General Statutes § 54-84 (b) does not permit a trial court to alter the language pertaining to the defendant's `failure to testify' despite a specific request by the defendant not to use that phrase because of its negative connotation?

"3. If the answer to question two is yes, should this court exercise its supervisory authority to substitute neutral language under General Statutes § 54-84 (b) when requested by the defendant?"

SULLIVAN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16217.

Jon L. Schoenhorn, in support of the petition.

John A. East III, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Casanova

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 18, 1999
742 A.2d 359 (Conn. 1999)
Case details for

State v. Casanova

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. JOHN CASANOVA, JR

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 18, 1999

Citations

742 A.2d 359 (Conn. 1999)
251 Conn. 919

Citing Cases

State v. Casanova

The Appellate Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court; id., 724; and we granted the defendant's…