From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 5, 1954
226 La. 57 (La. 1954)

Opinion

No. 41825.

July 2, 1954. Rehearing Denied October 5, 1954.

APPEAL FROM TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF ST. HELENA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE HORACE R. REID, J.

Neal N. Bagwell and Harrison G. Bagwell, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph A. Sims, Dist. Atty., Hammond, Grover L. Covington, Asst. Dist. Atty., Kentwood, Erlo J. Durbin, Asst. Dist. Atty., Denham Springs, for appellee.


The defendant was convicted and sentenced by the court to four years in the State Penitentiary for the theft of a cow. Article 67.1, Louisiana Criminal Code, LSA-R.S. 14:67.1.

When the appeal was called for hearing before this Court, none of the Bills of Exception were argued orally, nor has a brief been filed by the defendant.

The rule of law is that, under circumstances such as these, the presumption is that the appeal has been abandoned. State v. Latino, 138 La. 14, 69 So. 857; State v. Ducre, 173 La. 438, 137 So. 745; State v. Simpson, 216 La. 212, 43 So.2d 585; State v. De Soto, 221 La. 624, 60 So.2d 65; State v. Weaver, 222 La. 148, 62 So.2d 255.

This being a criminal case, we have made a most careful examination of the record, and we find no prejudicial error.

For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Carter

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 5, 1954
226 La. 57 (La. 1954)
Case details for

State v. Carter

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. DAVID CARTER

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 5, 1954

Citations

226 La. 57 (La. 1954)
74 So. 2d 902

Citing Cases

State v. Robinson

In view of the fact that the accused did not appear through counsel for oral argument of his appeal when…

State v. Perry

Under these circumstances the bills of exception are considered to be abandoned. State v. De Soto, 221 La.…