Opinion
Submitted October 29, 1937 —
Decided January 26, 1938.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 118 N.J.L. 429.
For the plaintiff in error, Joseph C. Cassini.
For the defendant in error, William A. Wachenfeld.
The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in its opinion. We reserve, however, and do not pass upon, the question of whether the admission in evidence of a certain X-ray photograph was error.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, PARKER, LLOYD, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, WALKER, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.