From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 15, 2020
376 N.C. 531 (N.C. 2020)

Opinion

No. 97A20-2

12-15-2020

STATE of North Carolina v. Antiwuan Tyrez CAMPBELL

Geeta Kapur, Attorney at Law, For Campbell, Antiwuan Tyrez. Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina. Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina. Nicholas R. Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina. Jon David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.


Geeta Kapur, Attorney at Law, For Campbell, Antiwuan Tyrez.

Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Joseph L. Hyde, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Nicholas R. Sanders, Assistant Attorney General, For State of North Carolina.

Jon David, District Attorney, For State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 24th of August 2020 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presented as the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th of December 2020."

Therefore the case is docketed as of the date of this order's certification. Briefs of the respective parties shall be submitted to this Court within the times allowed and in the manner provided by Appellate Rule 15(g)(2).


Summaries of

State v. Campbell

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Dec 15, 2020
376 N.C. 531 (N.C. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Antiwuan Tyrez CAMPBELL

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Dec 15, 2020

Citations

376 N.C. 531 (N.C. 2020)
851 S.E.2d 42

Citing Cases

State v. English

While this percentage warrants pause, "this standing alone is not sufficient to sustain a Batson challenge."…