observing that Calarruda had been sentenced for the possession of both a firearm and the ammunition, but recognizing a plain error because there was "no evidence that Calarruda had separately acquired or possessed the firearm and ammunition"
Summary of this case from State v. MillerNo. 28880.
April 21, 2009.
Summary Dispositional Orders Vacated and remanded.
observing that Calarruda had been sentenced for the possession of both a firearm and the ammunition, but recognizing a plain error because there was "no evidence that Calarruda had separately acquired or possessed the firearm and ammunition"
Summary of this case from State v. MillerFull title:State v. Calarruda
Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Date published: Apr 21, 2009
i'i 148, 155, 871 P.2d 782, 789 (1994) (citing only HRAP Rule 28 and noting that the appellant "violate[d]…