Opinion
Submitted June 9, 1924 —
Decided October 20, 1924.
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 99 N.J.L. 312.
For the plaintiff in error, James Mango.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Chief Justice Gummere in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, TRENCHARD, PARKER, KALISCH, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, CLARK, McGLENNON, KAYS, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.