From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Cabbagestalk

Supreme Court of Florida
May 1, 1986
487 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1986)

Opinion

No. 66993.

May 1, 1986.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender and Ellen Morris, Asst. Public Defender, Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, West Palm Beach, for respondent.


In Cabbagestalk v. State, 473 So.2d 718 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), the Fourth District, on the authority of Tamer v. State, 463 So.2d 1236 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), held the exclusionary rule applicable to probation revocation proceedings and certified to this Court the following question:

Under the 1983 amendment to article I, section 12 of the Florida Constitution, does the exclusionary rule apply in probation revocation hearings?

We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Because we have recently answered this question in the affirmative in State v. Cross, 487 So.2d 1056 (Fla. 1986), we approve the decision of the district court on the authority of Cross.

It is so ordered.

BOYD, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, EHRLICH, SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Cabbagestalk

Supreme Court of Florida
May 1, 1986
487 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1986)
Case details for

State v. Cabbagestalk

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. JAMES A. CABBAGESTALK, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 1, 1986

Citations

487 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 1986)