From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Byra

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1943
129 N.J.L. 384 (N.J. 1943)

Opinion

Submitted October 20, 1942 —

Decided January 22, 1943.

On appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 128 N.J.L. 429.

For the plaintiff in error, Schroeder Selser ( John E. Selser and James A. Major, of counsel).

For the defendant in error, John J. Breslin, Jr., Prosecutor of the Pleas, and James A. Breslin, Assistant Prosecutor of the Pleas.


The judgment is affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Mr. Justice Parker, with the express reservation of the questions discussed in the opinion below relative to the admission of certain evidence. The questions were not argued in this court and are therefore deemed to be abandoned.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Byra

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 22, 1943
129 N.J.L. 384 (N.J. 1943)
Case details for

State v. Byra

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR, v. STEVEN BYRA, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 22, 1943

Citations

129 N.J.L. 384 (N.J. 1943)
30 A.2d 49

Citing Cases

State v. Quatro

And, although the question has evoked controversy, it has been held that an indictment may, by separate…

State v. Vassalluzzo

These decisions, however, are not applicable here. This case is controlled by State v. Byra, 128 N.J.L. 429…