From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Burns

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 11, 1991
107 Or. App. 380 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

88-07-1542-C3; CA A62161 (Control) 88-07-1542-C2; CA A62298 (Cases Consolidated)

Argued and submitted October 26, 1990

Affirmed May 22 Reconsideration allowed by opinion September 11, 1991

Appeal from Circuit Court, Harney County.

Frank J. Yraguen, Judge.

Lisa A. Maxfield, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With her on the brief were Steven C. Rissberger and Ransom, Blackman Weil, Portland.

Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Rossman and De Muniz, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


After a trial to the court on stipulated facts, defendants were convicted of manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1), (4). They claim that the court erred in denying their motions to suppress and motions to controvert.

The facts of this case are set out in State v. Morrison/Bartee, 107 Or. App. 343, 812 P.2d 832 (1991), and the law and the result are the same.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Burns

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 11, 1991
107 Or. App. 380 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

State v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. DALE EDWARD BURNS, Appellant. STATE OF…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 11, 1991

Citations

107 Or. App. 380 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
812 P.2d 837

Citing Cases

State v. Morrison

Two motions, each relying on somewhat different factual assertions, but taking the same basic approach, were…