From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brumfield

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 5, 1954
75 So. 2d 23 (La. 1954)

Opinion

No. 41826.

July 2, 1954. Rehearing Denied October 5, 1954.

APPEAL FROM TWENTY-FIRST JUDICIAL COURT, PARISH OF ST. HELENA, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE HORACE R. REID, J.

Neal N. Bagwell, Baton Rouge, for defendant-appellant.

Fred S. LeBlanc, Atty. Gen., M. E. Culligan Asst. Atty. Gen., Joseph A. Sims, Dist. Atty., Hammond, Grover L. Covington, Asst. Dist. Atty., Kentwood, Erlo J. Durbin, Asst. Dist. Atty., Denham Springs, for appellee.


The defendant was indicted, tried and found guilty of the theft of a cow. Upon being sentenced to be imprisoned at hard labor in the State Penitentiary for a period of four years, he took and perfected the present appeal, having reserved certain bills of exception which appear in the record.

On the day his case had been fixed and was called for argument and submission in this Court, he made no appearance either in person or through counsel and no brief was filed on his behalf. Under those circumstances the Court would be justified in dismissing the appeal. However, as we have done before in similar situations in criminal cases, we examined the entire record to ascertain whether or not there are any errors patent on its face and having found none will follow the course heretofore pursued of affirming the judgment. See State v. De Soto, 221 La. 624, 60 So.2d 65; State v. Weaver, 222 La. 148, 62 So.2d 255.

For the reasons stated, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Brumfield

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Oct 5, 1954
75 So. 2d 23 (La. 1954)
Case details for

State v. Brumfield

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. SAMUEL BRUMFIELD

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Oct 5, 1954

Citations

75 So. 2d 23 (La. 1954)
226 La. 103

Citing Cases

State v. Scher

Consequently, and since there is no error patent on the face of the record, the rulings appealed from cannot…

State v. Robinson

In view of the fact that the accused did not appear through counsel for oral argument of his appeal when…