From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 22, 1974
355 A.2d 67 (Conn. 1974)

Opinion

Argued October 10, 1974

Decision released October 22, 1974

Information charging the defendant with the crime of selling a narcotic drug, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Healey, J.; verdict and judgment of guilty, from which the defendant appealed. No error.

The appellant filed a motion to reargue which was denied.

John R. Williams, for the appellant (defendant).

William F. Gallagher, special assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Arnold Markle, state's attorney, John J. Kelly and Ernest J. Diette, Jr., assistant state's attorneys, for the appellee (state).


The defendant, Philip Brooks, was convicted in a jury trial of a sale of narcotics in violation of 19-480 (a) of the General Statutes. He has appealed from the judgment rendered.

The sole ground of appeal briefed by the defendant was the claim that the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury that possession of heroin was a lesser included offense of the crime of sale of heroin. Of necessity, the defendant admits that unless this court reverses its decision in State v. Brown, 163 Conn. 52, 301 A.2d 547, he cannot prevail on this appeal. We adhere to our previous decision in State v. Brown, supra.


Summaries of

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Oct 22, 1974
355 A.2d 67 (Conn. 1974)
Case details for

State v. Brooks

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PHILIP BROOKS

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Oct 22, 1974

Citations

355 A.2d 67 (Conn. 1974)
355 A.2d 67

Citing Cases

State v. Whistnant

A review of the court's decisions since State v. Monte lends no credence to the claim that a defendant has a…

State v. Huot

In other words, the lesser offense must not require any element which is not needed to commit the greater…