State v. Branyon

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Loretta Galloway Branyon, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 6, 2014

Appellate Case No. 2012-212801 (S.C. Ct. App. Aug. 6, 2014)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2012-212801 Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-310

08-06-2014

The State, Respondent, v. Loretta Galloway Branyon, Appellant.

Charles W. Whiten, Jr., of Law Offices of Charles W. Whiten, Jr., P.A., of Anderson, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Anderson County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

AFFIRMED

Charles W. Whiten, Jr., of Law Offices of Charles W. Whiten, Jr., P.A., of Anderson, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina Theos Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("In order for an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]."); State v. Brown, 402 S.C. 119, 125, 740 S.E.2d 493, 496 (2013) (finding the appellant's argument unpreserved because he explicitly stated he had no objection to the jury instruction). AFFIRMED.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.