From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bragg

Supreme Court of Iowa
Dec 15, 1971
192 N.W.2d 810 (Iowa 1971)

Opinion

No. 54942.

December 15, 1971.

APPEAL FROM JASPER DISTRICT COURT, L.R. CARSON, J.

A. Fred Berger, Davenport, for appellant.

Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., Allen J. Lukehart, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Dennis F. Chalupa, County Atty., for appellee.


Defendant was charged by county attorney's information with the crime of larceny in the daytime of property of value exceeding $20 in violation of section 709.5, Code, 1966. Following a plea of guilty defendant was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary for an indeterminate term not to exceed five years. Defendant appeals contending the trial court abused its discretion by imposing overly severe punishment, refusing to grant probation, failing to consider testimony of witnesses called by defendant, and placing excessive emphasis on defendant's prior offenses.

At the time of sentence, the trial court had before it a presentence investigation report revealing past convictions and parole violations. The trial court also heard the testimony of four witnesses called by the defendant and personally questioned defendant who was represented by counsel at the hearing. We have said trial courts have broad discretion in granting or withholding bench paroles. State v. Cole, 168 N.W.2d 37, 40 (Iowa 1969). Where the sentence imposed does not exceed the statutory maximum, this court will not interfere unless an abuse of the trial court's discretion is shown. State v. Evans, 189 N.W.2d 582 (Iowa 1971), and cases cited therein. We find no abuse of discretion here.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Bragg

Supreme Court of Iowa
Dec 15, 1971
192 N.W.2d 810 (Iowa 1971)
Case details for

State v. Bragg

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. George Nicholas BRAGG, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Iowa

Date published: Dec 15, 1971

Citations

192 N.W.2d 810 (Iowa 1971)

Citing Cases

State v. Orozco

The instant assignment must be resolved adverse to defendant under recent pronouncements by this court. See…

State v. Carncross

Whether to fine or sentence defendant to jail rather than committing him to the penitentiary was addressed to…