From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bonnet

Utah Court of Appeals
Jun 26, 2003
2003 UT App. 221 (Utah Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 20021033-CA.

Filed June 26, 2003. (Not For Official Publication)

Appeal from the Seventh District, Monticello Department, The Honorable Lyle R. Anderson.

Rosalie Reilly, Monticello, for Appellants.

Mark L. Shurtleff and Joanne C. Slotnik, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.

Before Judges Jackson, Greenwood, and Orme.


MEMORANDUM DECISION


This case is before the court on a stipulated motion for summary reversal of the trial court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence obtained at a check point. The parties contend that, based on the recent opinion issued by the Utah Supreme Court in State v. Abell, 2003 UT 20, 473 Utah Adv. Rep. 11, the multi-purpose check point involved in the case before this court is unconstitutional.

Our review of the record supports the conclusion of the parties. Therefore, we summarily reverse the trial court's denial of Appellants' motion to suppress evidence obtained at a

check point. We further remand this case to the trial court for entry of further order as a result of this decision.

Norman H. Jackson, Presiding Judge, and Pamela T. Greenwood, Judge, concur.


The parties' stipulation is regular on its face. I see no need in such a case for this court to review the record or otherwise second-guess the considered assessment of counsel. I would prefer the court simply issue an order implementing the stipulation.


Summaries of

State v. Bonnet

Utah Court of Appeals
Jun 26, 2003
2003 UT App. 221 (Utah Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Bonnet

Case Details

Full title:State of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Derek James Bonnet and Geneen…

Court:Utah Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 26, 2003

Citations

2003 UT App. 221 (Utah Ct. App. 2003)