From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bischert

Supreme Court of Montana
Mar 27, 1957
131 Mont. 608 (Mont. 1957)

Opinion


308 P.2d 973 (Mont. 1957) 131 Mont. 608 STATE of Montana, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Donna Marie BISCHERT, Defendant and Appellant. No. 9708. Supreme Court of Montana. March 27, 1957

       Submitted March 7, 1957.

        Edward T. Dussault, Missoula, argued orally for appellant.

       Arnold H. Olsen, Atty. Gen., Forrest H. Anderson, Louis Forsell, Asst. Attys. Gen., Jay M. Kurtz, Anthony F. Keast, County Attys., Missoula, for respondent. Anthony

Page 974

F. Keast, County Atty., and Louis Forsell, Asst. Atty. Gen., argued orally.

       CASTLES, Justice.

       This matter is a companion case to State v. Bischert, Mont., 308 P.2d 969. This defendant was charged, together with her husband, John Francis Bischert, by the same information with the crime of manslaughter. This defendant was tried separately. The facts are similar in both cases. The objectionable exhibits were introduced in both cases and for the reasons stated in the opinion in State v. Bischert, Mont., 308 P.2d 969, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial.

       HARRISON, C. J., and BOTTOMLY, ANGSTMAN and ADAIR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Bischert

Supreme Court of Montana
Mar 27, 1957
131 Mont. 608 (Mont. 1957)
Case details for

State v. Bischert

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MONTANA, PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT, v. DONNA MARIE BISCHERT…

Court:Supreme Court of Montana

Date published: Mar 27, 1957

Citations

131 Mont. 608 (Mont. 1957)
131 Mont. 608

Citing Cases

State v. Zimmerman

"* * * In passing on the admissibility of such evidence, (gruesome color photographs of the victim's wounds),…

Metter v. Los Angeles Examiner

However, we are asked by appellant, as was the trial court, to infer that because a picture of his wife…