From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bicanich

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 26, 1975
334 A.2d 17 (N.J. 1975)

Opinion

Argued February 18, 1975 —

Decided February 26, 1975.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Julian Wilsey, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney). Mr. Daniel J. Carluccio argued the cause for respondent ( Messrs. Citta, Gasser, Carluccio and Holzapfel, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 132 N.J. Super. 393.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Bicanich

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 26, 1975
334 A.2d 17 (N.J. 1975)
Case details for

State v. Bicanich

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN BICANICH…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 26, 1975

Citations

334 A.2d 17 (N.J. 1975)
334 A.2d 17

Citing Cases

State v. Ramos

McCormick on Evidence, § 297 at 859 (3rd ed. 1984). Although fresh complaint is often characterized as an…

State v. Grossmick

Without it, on this record, I would hold that defendant was prejudiced and denied a full and fair trial. See…