Summary
In Bennett, the defendant argued on appeal that the evidence was insufficient to prove he ever possessed the firearms, either before or after the defendant and his brother pawned the firearms.
Summary of this case from U.S. v. PazourOpinion
No. 23516-1-II.
January 14, 2000. UNREPORTED OPINION
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clallam County, No. 97-1-00259-1, Kenneth D. Williams, J., entered June 17, 1998. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, C.J., and Houghton, J.