From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Beavers

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 18, 1992
838 P.2d 644 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

91-985, CA A71613

Submitted on record and briefs September 18, 1992, CA A71613 affirmed

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clackamas County.

Steven L. Maurer, Judge pro tempore.

Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, and David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Charles S. Crookham, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Janet A. Klapstein, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Joseph, Chief Judge, and Durham, Judge.

PER CURIAM

CA A71613 affirmed; CA A71612 remanded for resentencing and otherwise affirmed.


Defendant was convicted of felony driving while suspended (DWS), and his probation on an earlier theft conviction was revoked. Although he has appealed in both cases by a single notice of appeal, he assigns no error to the judgment in the DWS case. In the theft case, he asserts that the trial court lacked the authority to modify a previously ordered, but unexecuted, jail sentence by ordering that it be served consecutively to an unrelated prison sentence. The state concedes that defendant is correct, and we accept the concession.

CA A71613 affirmed; CA A71612 remanded for resentencing and otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Beavers

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 18, 1992
838 P.2d 644 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

State v. Beavers

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. RONALD LYLE BEAVERS, Appellant. (Cases…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 18, 1992

Citations

838 P.2d 644 (Or. Ct. App. 1992)
838 P.2d 644

Citing Cases

State v. Beavers

In his second assignment of error, defendant argues that the court erred in ordering the six-month jail term…