From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bailleaux

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 16, 1971
479 P.2d 245 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)

Summary

In State v. Bailleaux, 4 Or. App. 462, 479 P.2d 245 Sup Ct review denied (1971), the issue was the exact one urged by the defendant in this case — selective enforcement against men only.

Summary of this case from State v. Goddard

Opinion

Argued January 18, 1971

Affirmed January 18, 1971 Petition for rehearing denied February 5, 1971 Petition for review denied March 16, 1971

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, DOUGLAS L. HAY, Judge.

Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem.

Gary D. Gortmaker, District Attorney, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, Chief Judge, and LANGTRY and FORT, Judges.


AFFIRMED.


This appeal presented no unusual or difficult questions. Having previously studied the briefs, immediately upon conclusion of argument, and after briefly stating to counsel our reasons, we ruled from the bench. Setting forth those reasons in a detailed opinion would add nothing of value to the existing body of judicial precedent. Our ruling was:

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Bailleaux

Oregon Court of Appeals
Mar 16, 1971
479 P.2d 245 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)

In State v. Bailleaux, 4 Or. App. 462, 479 P.2d 245 Sup Ct review denied (1971), the issue was the exact one urged by the defendant in this case — selective enforcement against men only.

Summary of this case from State v. Goddard
Case details for

State v. Bailleaux

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. PAUL ROWTON BAILLEAUX, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Mar 16, 1971

Citations

479 P.2d 245 (Or. Ct. App. 1971)
479 P.2d 245

Citing Cases

State v. Goddard

230 Or at 611. In State v. Bailleaux, 4 Or. App. 462, 479 P.2d 245 Sup Ct review denied (1971), the issue was…