From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Bacsko

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 20, 1967
231 A.2d 811 (N.J. 1967)

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1967 —

Decided July 20, 1967.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Frederick Klaessig argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Richard S. Cohen, Assistant County Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Edward J. Dolan, Middlesex County Prosecutor, attorney).


Defendant was convicted of bookmaking in violation of N.J.S. 2A:112-3. The conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division in an unreported opinion. We granted certification. 48 N.J. 139 (1966). The principal issue is whether the trial court erred in refusing to require the disclosure of the identity of an informer. The issue is the same one involved in State v. Oliver, 50 N.J. 39 (1967), decided this day. For the reasons stated in Oliver, we agree with the judgment of the Appellate Division. No other question in the case requires discussion.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR and HALL — 5.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Bacsko

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jul 20, 1967
231 A.2d 811 (N.J. 1967)
Case details for

State v. Bacsko

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ALBERT BACSKO…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jul 20, 1967

Citations

231 A.2d 811 (N.J. 1967)
231 A.2d 811

Citing Cases

State v. Oliver

We granted certification, 48 N.J. 143 (1966). The case was argued with State v. Bacsko, 50 N.J. 49 (1967),…

State v. Krempecki

Defendant was convicted of bookmaking in violation of N.J.S. 2A:112-3. He appealed to the Appellate Division.…