From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Arroyo

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 15, 2007
937 A.2d 694 (Conn. 2007)

Opinion

November 15, 2007


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 104 Conn. App. 167 (AC 28044), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the special credibility instruction mandated in State v. Patterson, 276 Conn. 452, 886 A.2d 777 (2005), was not applicable?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the verdicts were not legally inconsistent?"
Andrew S. Liskov, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Bruce R. Lockwood, assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

SCHALLER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18031.


Summaries of

State v. Arroyo

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Nov 15, 2007
937 A.2d 694 (Conn. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Arroyo

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. REYNALDO ARROYO

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Nov 15, 2007

Citations

937 A.2d 694 (Conn. 2007)
284 Conn. 938

Citing Cases

State v. Arroyo

Thereafter, this court granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal limited to the following…