From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Angell

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 22, 1995
655 A.2d 259 (Conn. 1995)

Opinion

(15206)

Decided February 22, 1995


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 36 Conn. App. 383 (AC 12359), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the defendant's federal constitutional rights of confrontation were not violated when the trial court admitted into evidence constancy of accusation testimony.

"2. Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the defendant's exception to the trial court's failure to instruct the jury on the credibility of a child witness was inadequate to preserve the issue for appeal."


R. Jeffrey Lyman, Patricia E. McCooey and Linda L. Morkan, in support of the petition.

Pamela S. Meotti, deputy assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Summaries of

State v. Angell

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Feb 22, 1995
655 A.2d 259 (Conn. 1995)
Case details for

State v. Angell

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. PAUL ANGELL

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Feb 22, 1995

Citations

655 A.2d 259 (Conn. 1995)
655 A.2d 259

Citing Cases

State v. Angell

" and (2) "Whether the Appellate Court was correct in concluding that the defendant's exception to the trial…