From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State of Oregon v. Robert G. Spencer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 1987
744 P.2d 1009 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

DA335277; CA A44235

Argued and submitted October 16, 1987

Appeal dismissed November 12, 1987

Appeal from District Court, Multnomah County.

Frank L. Bearden, Judge.

William Uhle, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Thomas H. Denney, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Warden, Presiding Judge, and Van Hoomissen and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Appeal dismissed.


Defendant appeals from a trial court order which denied his motion to dismiss on the ground of former jeopardy. There is no judgment of conviction or any basis for an interlocutory appeal in this case. ORS 138.040. Defendant does not seek a writ of mandamus. See State ex rel Wark v. Freerksen, 84 Or. App. 90, 733 P.2d 100 (1987). The order denying his motion is not appealable. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State of Oregon v. Robert G. Spencer

Oregon Court of Appeals
Nov 12, 1987
744 P.2d 1009 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

State of Oregon v. Robert G. Spencer

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. ROBERT G. SPENCER, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Nov 12, 1987

Citations

744 P.2d 1009 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)
744 P.2d 1009

Citing Cases

State v. Salzmann

" More importantly, the remedy of direct interlocutory appeal, which is the specific right defendant seeks…