From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State of Alaska v. K L Distributors, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 1963
318 F.2d 498 (9th Cir. 1963)

Opinion

No. 17183.

June 17, 1963.

Ralph E. Moody, Atty. Gen. for the State of Alaska, Gary Thurlow, Deputy Atty. Gen. for the State of Alaska, John E. Havelock, Asst. Atty. Gen. for the State of Alaska, Juneau, Alaska, for appellants.

Franco Bensussen, Albert M. Franco, Seattle, Wash., McNealy, Merdes Camarot, Robert J. McNealy, Fairbanks, Alaska, and Peter J. Kalmarides, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellees.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLIN and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.


The judgment herein of the United States District Court for the District of Alaska, the constitutional court established on or about February 20, 1960, after the termination of the life of the interim court (manned by federal personnel) which functioned in the state after statehood, is vacated.

No federal question is involved and diversity of citizenship was erroneously assumed to exist, but this cannot be because domestic states of the Union have never been regarded as citizens.

The case is remanded to the United States District Court for the District of Alaska. It may be assumed that a court always has jurisdiction to keep house and control of its records. The parties appear to be agreeable that the district court transfer the case to the Superior Court for the State of Alaska. If the district court should choose to transfer the case to the state judicial system, questions of jurisdiction, if any, would be for the state side of the street and not the federal in view of the posture of the case.


Summaries of

State of Alaska v. K L Distributors, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 1963
318 F.2d 498 (9th Cir. 1963)
Case details for

State of Alaska v. K L Distributors, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF ALASKA, Alcoholic Beverage Control Board of the State of Alaska…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 17, 1963

Citations

318 F.2d 498 (9th Cir. 1963)

Citing Cases

Fifty Associates v. Prudential Ins. Co.

(Citations)" Arctic Maid is by no means the only decision to affirm the principle that neither a state nor a…

Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Kalo Brick & Tile Co.

295 N.W.2d 467, 468-469 (1979). See Brancadora v. Federal Nat. Mortgage Assn., 344 F.2d 933, 935 (CA9 1965);…