holding that a disciplinary sanction of the loss of 100 days good time credits did not violate the Eighth Amendment
Summary of this case from Nguyen v. Kelly90-16497, 90-16521.
February 28, 1992.
N.D.Cal., 745 F.Supp. 595.
AFFIRMED
holding that a disciplinary sanction of the loss of 100 days good time credits did not violate the Eighth Amendment
Summary of this case from Nguyen v. Kellyfinding no Eighth Amendment violation where inmate was deprived of towel, toothbrush, toothpaste, and soap for thirty-four days
Summary of this case from Hagan v. Chambersnoting that while "it has been held that 'the Eighth Amendment forbids deprivation of the basic elements of hygiene,'" the deprivation of a towel, toothbrush, toothpowder, comb, soap, and other personal hygiene items for approximately 34 days did not rise to the level of an Eighth Amendment violation
Summary of this case from Perry v. Agric. DeptFull title:State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. v. Baer
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Date published: Feb 28, 1992
Despite this general rule, statutory mootness does not apply, in pertinent part, where: (1) the purchaser…
U.S. v. TaymanSee Van Daalwyk v. United States, 21 F.3d 179, 181-83 (7th Cir. 1994); Gilberti v. United States, 917 F.2d…