From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 8, 2015
2015 Ohio 3637 (Ohio 2015)

Summary

In Youngstown, this court considered whether the board abused its discretion in excluding from the ballot a proposed amendment to the Youngstown city charter that would have made it unlawful within the city to extract oil and gas through hydrofracturing.

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Khumprakob v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Opinion

NO. 2015-1422

09-08-2015

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULING

This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus involving an expedited election matter.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the following expedited briefing schedule is set for this case in lieu of the schedule set forth in S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.08.

• The relator's brief and evidence are due no later than Thursday, September 10, 2015, by 5:00 p.m.;

• The respondents' brief and evidence are due no later than Saturday, September 12, 2015, by 5:00 p.m.; and

• The relator's reply brief is due no later than Sunday, September 13, 2015, by 5:00 p.m.

The respondents' brief and evidence and relator's reply brief shall be filed electronically through the court's E-Filing Portal and all other documents filed in this case may be filed through the E-Filing Portal or pursuant to any other method permitted by the Supreme Court Rules of Practice.

No requests or stipulations for extension of time shall be accepted in this case and the clerk's office shall refuse to accept for filing any request or stipulation for extension of time. Pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.08(C), all documents filed in this case shall be served on the date of filing by personal service, facsimile transmission, or e-mail.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Supreme Court of Ohio
Sep 8, 2015
2015 Ohio 3637 (Ohio 2015)

In Youngstown, this court considered whether the board abused its discretion in excluding from the ballot a proposed amendment to the Youngstown city charter that would have made it unlawful within the city to extract oil and gas through hydrofracturing.

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Khumprakob v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Elections
Case details for

State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cnty. Bd. of Elections

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Youngstown v. Mahoning Cty. Bd. of Elections

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Sep 8, 2015

Citations

2015 Ohio 3637 (Ohio 2015)
143 Ohio St. 3d 1456
37 N.E.3d 171

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Twitchell v. Saferin

{¶ 6} Twitchell, Mack, and Nestor have not shown that the elections board abused its discretion in keeping…

State ex rel. McGinn v. Walker

In other words, an elections board could not invalidate a proposed measure that it believed would be unlawful…