From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Williams v. Sutula

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Aug 17, 2004
2004 Ohio 4343 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 85003.

DATE OF JOURNALIZATION: August 17, 2004.

Writ Denied, Order No. 362736, Motion No. 362659.

Willis Williams, Pro Se, Inmate No. 155-394, Richland Correctional Inst., P.O. Box 8107, Mansfield, Ohio 44901, for Relator.

William D. Mason, Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, Diane Smilanick, Assistant County Prosecutor, Justice Center — 9th Floor, 1200 Ontario Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44113, for Respondent.


ORIGINAL ACTION JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION


{¶ 1} On July 23, 2004, relator, Willis Williams, commenced this mandamus action against Judge John D. Sutula to compel the issuance of findings of fact and conclusions of law pertaining to Williams' petition for postconviction relief which the judge denied on December 22, 2003. The respondent, through the Cuyahoga County Prosecutor's office, moved for summary judgment. For the following reasons, we grant the motion for summary judgment and deny the writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} Attached to the respondent's motion for summary judgment is a copy of the court's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Thus, Williams' request for a writ of mandamus is moot. State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163; State ex rel. Jerningham v. Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d 723.

{¶ 3} We also find that Williams failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25, which mandates that he attach an affidavit to his complaint that describes each civil action or appeal of a civil action filed in the previous five years. The failure to provide such affidavit constitutes sufficient grounds for dismissal of the relator's complaint for a writ of mandamus. State ex rel. Zanders v. Ohio Parole Board, 82 Ohio St.3d 421, 1998-Ohio-218, 696 N.E.2d 594; State ex rel. Alford v. Winters, 80 Ohio St.3d 285, 1997-Ohio-117, 685 N.E.2d 1242.

{¶ 4} Accordingly, we grant the respondent's motion for summary judgment. Relator to bear costs. It is further ordered that the clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and date of entry pursuant to Civ.R. 58(B).

Writ denied.

Corrigan, A.J., concurs. Rocco, J., concurs.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Williams v. Sutula

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County
Aug 17, 2004
2004 Ohio 4343 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Williams v. Sutula

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, ex rel. Willis Williams, Relator, v. Judge John D. Sutula…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County

Date published: Aug 17, 2004

Citations

2004 Ohio 4343 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Davis v. Jasper County

(1) Sec. 11080, R.S. 1919, under which plaintiff was paid $3500 salary per year as prosecuting attorney from…