From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. Vitoratos, v. Morris

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 1, 1970
257 N.E.2d 398 (Ohio 1970)

Opinion

No. 70-36

Decided April 1, 1970.

Bill of exceptions in criminal case — Mandamus to require respondent to furnish indigent defendant at state expense — Bill filed in Court of Appeals — No duty to furnish multiple copies to defendant.

IN MANDAMUS.

Mr. William Vitoratos, in propria persona. Mr. David Dowd, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and Mr. Clay E. Hunter, for respondent.


This is an action in mandamus originating in this court.

Relator seeks to require respondent to furnish him with a copy of the bill of exceptions in his June 1969 trial in the Common Pleas Court of Stark County, wherein he was convicted of violation of Section 2905.44, Revised Code.

Notice of appeal was seasonably filed and motion for a bill of exceptions at the expense of the state for the reason of indigency was granted. The bill of exceptions was filed in the Court of Appeals in November 1969.

The state is not required to furnish multiple copies of the bill of exceptions to defendant. See State, ex rel. Vitoratos, v. Walsh, 173 Ohio St. 467, and State, ex rel. Terrell, v. Court of Common Pleas, 174 Ohio St. 209.

A writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

O'NEILL, SCHNEIDER, HERBERT, DUNCAN and CORRIGAN, JJ., concur.

CHIEF JUSTICE TAFT participated in this case which was, however, decided after his death.

MATTHIAS, J., not participating.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. Vitoratos, v. Morris

Supreme Court of Ohio
Apr 1, 1970
257 N.E.2d 398 (Ohio 1970)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. Vitoratos, v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. VITORATOS, v. MORRIS, JUDGE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Apr 1, 1970

Citations

257 N.E.2d 398 (Ohio 1970)
257 N.E.2d 398

Citing Cases

State v. Lewis

An indigent defendant is not entitled to multiple copies of the transcript of proceedings. State, ex rel.…

State, ex Rel. Vitoratos, v. Yacobucci

As recently as April 1, 1970, this court denied a writ of mandamus, sought by the same relator, on the basis…