From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel., v. Prescott

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 1933
148 So. 533 (Fla. 1933)

Opinion

Opinion filed May 18, 1933.

A case of original jurisdiction — habeas corpus.

W. W. Flournoy, for Relator;

Cary D. Landis, Attorney General, and Roy Campbell, Assistant, for Defendant.


This case is before the Court on application for writ of habeas corpus, the writ which issued pursuant thereto and the return of the respondent.

The record shows that prior to the application for writ of habeas corpus in this Court the petitioner had applied for and procured issuance of a writ of habeas corpus before the Honorable A. G. Campbell, Judge of the First Judicial Circuit of Florida. That upon hearing, after return, the said Judge of the Circuit Court made an order remanding petitioner to the custody of the sheriff.

It further appears from the record that in that case the identical questions and parties were involved which are involved here. There was no writ of error taken to the judgment in that behalf.

Circuit Courts and the Supreme Court of Florida, or any Justice thereof, have concurrent jurisdiction in original habeas corpus proceedings. The judgment of the Circuit Court in such cases becomes absolute, unless reviewed on writ of error by the appellate court and such judgment becomes res adjudicata as to questions of law involved in that case. Therefore, the writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued by a Justice of this Court should be quashed and the petitioner remanded to execute the judgment of the Circuit Court heretofore entered and above referred to. See State ex rel. Davis v. Hardie, 108 Fla. 133, 146 So.2d 97; Sec. 5444 C. G. L. (3580) R. G. S.

It is so ordered.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, ELLIS, TERRELL, and BUFORD, J. J., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel., v. Prescott

Supreme Court of Florida
May 18, 1933
148 So. 533 (Fla. 1933)
Case details for

State, ex Rel., v. Prescott

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, ex rel. FRANK WILLIAMS, Relator, v. H. M. PRESCOTT…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 18, 1933

Citations

148 So. 533 (Fla. 1933)
148 So. 533

Citing Cases

Durley v. Mayo

However, the Supreme Court of Florida has treated § 79.10 as applying the general rule of res judicata. See…

Taylor v. Chapman

See 34 C.J. 71-82. It follows that the order made by Judge Atkinson, and its effect, is not properly before…