From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 5, 1929
121 Ohio St. 186 (Ohio 1929)

Opinion

No. 21715

Decided June 5, 1929.

Municipal corporations — Aircraft landing fields and terminals are public utilities — Section 3939, General Code — Municipal referendum statutes apply thereto.

The authority given to municipalities in this state by Section 3939, General Code, to purchase or condemn land necessary for landing fields for aircraft and transportation terminals and rights of way for connection with highways and railways gives to such establishments the character of a public utility, and all laws applicable to municipally owned utilities are applicable thereto.

IN MANDAMUS.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

Mr. Thomas M. Miller and Mr. C.A. Fisher, for relator.

Mr. J.E. Kinnison, city solicitor, and Mr. James L. Amerman, for defendants.


This is an original suit in this court in mandamus to compel the authorities of the city of Canton, Ohio, to submit an ordinance adopted by the council of said city to a referendum of the people. The general purport of the ordinance is that the executive officers of the city be authorized and empowered to purchase a certain described parcel of land as a site for a municipal airport. It is admitted that the council of the city had previously adopted an ordinance providing for an issue of bonds to provide funds "for a landing field for aircraft." It is therefore urged by defendants that the ordinance now sought to be submitted to a referendum is not the initial legislation on that subject, and that it is therefore not subject to a referendum under the statute. It is contended by relator that the establishment of a landing field for aircraft is the establishment of a public utility, and that therefore every ordinance pertaining to that subject is subject to a referendum under Section 8 of Article XVIII of the Ohio Constitution.

Section 3939, General Code, gives authority to municipalities "for purchasing or condemning land necessary for landing fields, either within or without the limits of a municipality, for air crafts and transportation terminals and uses associated therewith or incident thereto, and the right of way for connections with highways, electric, steam and interurban railroads and improving and equipping the same with structures necessary or appropriate for such purposes." Manifestly no argument is necessary to show that a landing field for aircraft is a public utility. If it were not a public utility, the Legislature would have no power to make provision for purchase and condemnation of lands for such purposes. It being a public utility, the question of the right to a referendum has already been settled by this court in State, ex rel. Diehl, Jr., v. Abele, 119 Ohio St. 210, 162 N.E. 807, decided June 20, 1928. Upon the authority of that case, the writ of mandamus will be allowed.

Writ allowed.

KINKADE, ROBINSON, DAY and ALLEN, JJ., concur.

JONES and MATTHIAS, JJ., concur in the syllabus, but dissent from the judgment.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 5, 1929
121 Ohio St. 186 (Ohio 1929)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. CHANDLER v. JACKSON ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 5, 1929

Citations

121 Ohio St. 186 (Ohio 1929)
167 N.E. 396

Citing Cases

Woodmansee v. Kansas City

Lewith, 26 Fla. 163, 7 So. 885; Caldwell v. Alton, 33 Ill. 416; Spaulding v. City of Lowell, 23 Pick. 71;…

Trans World Airlines v. City and County of San Francisco

The public function of a municipal airport is recognized in many cases. State ex rel. City of Lincoln v.…