From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville, December Term, 1930
Apr 4, 1931
38 S.W.2d 551 (Tenn. 1931)

Opinion

Opinion filed April 4, 1931.

1. TAXATION. Statutes. Inheritance tax is privilege tax upon acquisition and not upon transmission of property.

The inheritance and succession tax is a privilege tax imposed on the right to acquire property by succession, not on the right to transmit. (Post, p. 369.)

Case cited and approved: State v. Alston, 94 Tenn. (10 Pickle), 674.

2. TAXATION. Inheritance taxes. Inheritance tax is special tax construed favorably to taxpayers.

The inheritance tax is a special tax subject to the rule that such taxes are to be construed favorably to the taxpayer. (Post, p. 369.)

Cases cited and approved: Henson v. Monday, 143 Tenn. (16 Thomp.), 418; Crenshaw v. Moore, 124 Tenn. (16 Cates), 528; Bailey v. Henry, 125 Tenn. (17 Cates), 390; State v. Branham, 143 Tenn. (16 Thomp.), 292.

3. TAXATION. Statutes. Inheritance taxes. Dower and homestead not subject to inheritance tax under Act of 1919.

The dower and homestead assigned to a widow are not liable for inheritance tax under the Act of 1919, which does not in express terms include dower and homestead within the tax. (Post, p. 370.)

Act cited and construed: Acts 1919, ch. 46.

Case cited and approved: Crenshaw v. Moore, 124 Tenn. (16 Cates), 528; White v. Blackford, 146 Tenn. (19 Thomp.), 612; Kitts v. Kitts, 136 Tenn. (9 Thomp.), 314.

Citing: 37 A.L.R., 541.

FROM RUTHERFORD.

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Rutherford County. — HON. THOS. B. LYTLE, Chancellor.

J.W. SPARKS, for complainant, appellant.

HANCOCK HANCOCK, for defendants, appellees.


This is an appeal from a decree denying the right of the State's representatives to assess for inheritance taxes the value of the dower and homestead assigned to a widow. This is the sole question. The husband died before the passage of the Act of 1929, Chap. 29, Extra Session, which in terms includes dower and homestead within the tax. It is clear that no such provisions had been expressly made in the Act of 1919, Chap. 46, or our earlier acts.

It is well settled that the inheritance and succession tax is a privilege tax imposed on the right to acquire property by succession, not on the right to transmit ( State v. Alston, 94 Tenn. 674); and that it is a special tax subject to the rule that such taxes are to be construed favorably to the taxpayer. Henson v. Monday, 143 Tenn. 418 ; Crenshaw v. Moore, 124 Tenn. 528, 137 S.W. 924, 34 L.R.A. (N.S.), 1161, Ann. Cas. 1913A, 165; Bailey v. Henry, 125 Tenn. 390; State v. Branham, 143 Tenn. 292.

And in Crenshaw v. Moore, supra, construing the Act of 1909, Chap. 479, and previous acts, which in this particular do not materially differ from the Act of 1919, this Court held that neither the year's support of the widow, nor her dower in her husband's land, was subject to the inheritance tax. The principle involved is recognized in White v. Blackford, 146 Tenn. 612, holding the year's support exempt from this tax. Also see Kitts v. Kitts, 136 Tenn. 314.

In 37 A.L.R., page 541, will be found a note citing numerous cases holding that dower or the widow's statutory right is not subject to a succession tax. Tennessee is classified with the States so holding, citing Crenshaw v. Moore, supra.

Opinions in this and other States recognize that the homestead right is a creature of the constitution and that this and the dower right pass to the wife, not by transfer from the deceased husband, but by right of marriage and by statutes declaratory of the common law.

We find no error in the decree of the Chancellor. Affirmed.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. v. Clayton

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville, December Term, 1930
Apr 4, 1931
38 S.W.2d 551 (Tenn. 1931)
Case details for

State ex Rel. v. Clayton

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel., McCABE, COM'R., COMPLAINANT, APPELLANT, v. JAMES K…

Court:Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville, December Term, 1930

Date published: Apr 4, 1931

Citations

38 S.W.2d 551 (Tenn. 1931)
38 S.W.2d 551

Citing Cases

Valley Fidelity Bank Trust v. Benson

In considering the principal question raised in this appeal — whether our inheritance tax laws subject the…

Lewis v. O'Hair

The text seems to be supported by the weight of authority, although some expressions to the contrary may be…