From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Taylor v. Hall

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1972
257 So. 2d 153 (La. 1972)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In State ex rel. Taylor v. Hall, 129 Neb. 669, 262 N.W. 835, this court said: "We have no hesitancy in holding that judges of the supreme court, judges of the district court, * * * respectively, constitute separate and distinct classes for purposes of legislation regarding them; * * *."

Summary of this case from Garrotto v. McManus
See 3 Summaries

Opinion

No. 52105.

February 10, 1972.

In re: Sunday Taylor applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application not considered. Applicant's remedy has not been exhausted in the lower court, where proceedings are pending.

Summaries of

State ex Rel. Taylor v. Hall

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 10, 1972
257 So. 2d 153 (La. 1972)

In State ex rel. Taylor v. Hall, 129 Neb. 669, 262 N.W. 835, this court said: "We have no hesitancy in holding that judges of the supreme court, judges of the district court, * * * respectively, constitute separate and distinct classes for purposes of legislation regarding them; * * *."

Summary of this case from Garrotto v. McManus

In State ex rel. Taylor v. Hall, 129 Neb. 669, 262 N.W. 835, we said: "The legislature may legislate in regard to a class of persons, but they cannot take what may he termed a natural class of persons, split that class in two, and then arbitrarily designate the dissevered fractions of the original unit as two classes, and enact different rules for the government of each.

Summary of this case from Wittler v. Baumgartner

In State ex rel. Taylor v. Hall, 129 Neb. 669, 262 N.W. 835, it was determined that: "The legislature may make a reasonable classification of persons, corporations and property for purposes of legislation concerning them, but the classification must rest upon real differences in situation and circumstances surrounding the members of the class, relative to the subject of the legislation, which render appropriate its enactment; and to be valid the law must operate uniformly and alike upon every member of the class so designated."

Summary of this case from Arrigo v. City of Lincoln
Case details for

State ex Rel. Taylor v. Hall

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA EX REL. SUNDAY TAYLOR v. RUFUS S. HALL, WARDEN…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 10, 1972

Citations

257 So. 2d 153 (La. 1972)
260 La. 694

Citing Cases

Wittler v. Baumgartner

It is also fundamental that, although it is competent for the Legislature to classify for purposes of…

Wilson v. Marsh

The fact that a part of a law is invalid does not always require that the entire law be treated as void. If…

13 Citing Cases