From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. O'Quinn v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 22, 1974
303 So. 2d 174 (La. 1974)

Summary

In Lee v. O'Quinn, 184 Ga. 44 (190 S.E. 564) (1937), written notice was not a provision called for in the note sued upon.

Summary of this case from Woodstock Road Investment Properties v. Lacy

Opinion

No. 55448.

November 22, 1974.

IN RE: ONAR LEE O'QUINN APPLYING FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS, CERTIORARI AND PROHIBITION.


Writ granted. Evidentiary hearing ordered. See Garrison v. Cupp, 415 F.2d 353 (9th Cir. 1969).

SANDERS, C. J., SUMMERS and MARCUS, JJ., dissent from the granting of the writ. See Breaux v. Henderson, 447 F.2d 466 (5th Cir. 1971) and the authorities therein cited.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. O'Quinn v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Nov 22, 1974
303 So. 2d 174 (La. 1974)

In Lee v. O'Quinn, 184 Ga. 44 (190 S.E. 564) (1937), written notice was not a provision called for in the note sued upon.

Summary of this case from Woodstock Road Investment Properties v. Lacy
Case details for

State ex Rel. O'Quinn v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA EX REL. ONAR LEE O'QUINN v. C. MURRAY HENDERSON…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Nov 22, 1974

Citations

303 So. 2d 174 (La. 1974)

Citing Cases

White v. Turbidy

Where, as in this case, a real estate installment note provided for the payment of annual instalments thereon…

Redmond v. Merrill Lynch c. Management

" By letter dated July 27, 1981, his attorney advised the makers he was accelerating the entire indebtedness…