From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Norris v. Giavasis

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 31, 2003
2003 Ohio 6609 (Ohio 2003)

Summary

In State ex rel. Norris v. Giavasis, 100 Ohio St.3d 371, 2003-Ohio-6609, the relator filed an affidavit that he claimed listed his prior "civil actions and * * * appeals within the preceding five years pursuant to [R.C.] 2969.25."

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Francis v. Stuard

Opinion

No. 2003-1478.

Submitted December 2, 2003.

Decided December 31, 2003.

Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Stark County, No. 2003CA00268.

Robert Lee Norris, pro se.


{¶ 1} On July 24, 2003, appellant, Robert Lee Norris, an inmate, filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals for Stark County. Norris sought a writ of mandamus to compel appellees, Stark County Common Pleas Court Clerk Phil G. Giavasis and Deputy Clerk A. Gifford, to remove from their records "the July 11, 2003 Appearance Docket and each of its entries" and to retain "the certified `June 25, 2002' Appearance Docket." The docket entries were of his criminal case stemming from a 1992 indictment.

{¶ 2} Norris filed an affidavit that he claimed listed his prior "civil actions and criminal appeals within the preceding (5) five years pursuant to [R.C.] 2969.25." The affidavit, however, did not contain a "brief description of the nature" of each civil action or appeal and the outcome of each civil action and appeal. R.C. 2969.25(A)(1) and (4). And although Norris requested a waiver of the filing fees assessed by the court of appeals based on his claimed indigency, his affidavit of indigency did not contain the statement required by R.C. 2969.25(C)(1) setting forth the balance in his inmate account "for each of the preceding six months, as certified by the institutional cashier."

{¶ 3} On August 1, 2003, the court of appeals sua sponte dismissed Norris's complaint.

{¶ 4} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. "The requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with them subjects an inmate's action to dismissal." State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 5. Norris failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) and 2969.25(C)(1). State ex rel. Kimbro v. Glavas, 97 Ohio St.3d 197, 2002-Ohio-5808, 777 N.E.2d 257, ¶ 2; White, 99 Ohio St.3d 11, 2003-Ohio-2262, 788 N.E.2d 634, ¶ 2, 5.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Norris v. Giavasis

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 31, 2003
2003 Ohio 6609 (Ohio 2003)

In State ex rel. Norris v. Giavasis, 100 Ohio St.3d 371, 2003-Ohio-6609, the relator filed an affidavit that he claimed listed his prior "civil actions and * * * appeals within the preceding five years pursuant to [R.C.] 2969.25."

Summary of this case from State ex rel. Francis v. Stuard
Case details for

State ex Rel. Norris v. Giavasis

Case Details

Full title:The State ex rel. Norris, Appellant, v. Giavasis, Clerk, et al., Appellees

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 31, 2003

Citations

2003 Ohio 6609 (Ohio 2003)
2003 Ohio 6609
800 N.E.2d 365

Citing Cases

Watson v. Foley

The Supreme Court has held that "[t]he requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to comply with…

State v. Norman

The Supreme Court of Ohio has held that "[t]he requirements of R.C. 2969.25 are mandatory, and failure to…