From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Landry v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jan 18, 2013
106 So. 3d 106 (La. 2013)

Opinion

No. 2011–KH–0796.

2013-01-18

STATE ex rel. Albert LANDRY v. STATE of Louisiana.


In re Landry, Albert;—Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 256–545.
PER CURIAM.

[2011-0796 (La. 1]Writ granted. Relator is presently serving a sentence of life imprisonment without possibility of parole for a second degree murder committed in 1976 when he was 17 years old. The sentence was mandated by the penalty provision of the statute establishing the offense. R.S. 14:30.1. In 2011, relator filed a motion to correct an illegal sentence in which he contended that a sentence of life imprisonment without parole for a juvenile offender is no longer constitutionally permissible under developing legal standards, and in particular in light of Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010) (Eighth Amendment precludes sentencing juvenile offenders to life imprisonment without parole for non-homicide crimes). The district court (Johnson, J) denied relief. While review of that judgment was pending, the United States Supreme Court determined that mandatory life without parole for those under the age of 18 at the time of their crimes violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on “cruel and unusual punishments”. Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. ––––, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012). Unlike the case in Graham, the Miller court did not establish a categorical prohibition against life without parole for juveniles but instead required that a sentencing court consider an offender's youth and attendant characteristics as mitigating circumstances before [2011-0796 (La. 2]deciding whether to impose the harshest possibly penalty for juveniles. Therefore, we grant to remand to the district court to reconsider the sentence after conducting a new sentencing hearing in accordance with the principles enunciated in Miller v. Alabama. CLARK, J. dissenting.

[2011-0796 (La. 1]I would grant the writ for consideration for a full analysis under Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989).


Summaries of

State ex rel. Landry v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jan 18, 2013
106 So. 3d 106 (La. 2013)
Case details for

State ex rel. Landry v. State

Case Details

Full title:STATE ex rel. Albert LANDRY v. STATE of Louisiana.

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana.

Date published: Jan 18, 2013

Citations

106 So. 3d 106 (La. 2013)

Citing Cases

State v. Tate

To resolve the dispute between the lower courts regarding the retroactivity of Miller on collateral review,…