From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. Kirtz, v. Corrigan

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 29, 1989
546 N.E.2d 1327 (Ohio 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-1183

Submitted October 24, 1989 —

Decided November 29, 1989.

Mandamus — Attorneys at law — Assignment of counsel for indigent defendants — Crim. R. 44 and Loc. R. 33 — Alleged noncompliance with assignment system — Judgment reversed and cause remanded when claim for relief shown.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 55598.

Russell P. Kirtz, pro se. Daniel O. Corrigan, pro se.


Upon review of the matter presented to us, we find that appellant, Russell R. Kirtz, has stated a claim for relief. The judgment of the court of appeals dismissing appellant's complaint in mandamus is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. Kirtz, v. Corrigan

Supreme Court of Ohio
Nov 29, 1989
546 N.E.2d 1327 (Ohio 1989)
Case details for

State, ex Rel. Kirtz, v. Corrigan

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. KIRTZ, APPELLANT, v. CORRIGAN, JUDGE, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Nov 29, 1989

Citations

546 N.E.2d 1327 (Ohio 1989)
546 N.E.2d 1327

Citing Cases

State, ex Rel. Kirtz, v. Corrigan

We reversed and remanded. State, ex rel. Kirtz, v. Corrigan (1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 45, 546 N.E.2d 1327. After…