From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 29, 1942
4 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 1942)

Opinion

No. 33,160.

May 29, 1942.

Appeal and error — nonappealable order.

Order denying a motion to vacate an order granting and refusing separate requests for judgment on the pleadings, itself a nonappealable order, does not acquire appealable status.

Mandamus in the district court for Ramsey county upon the relation of Lola O. Gresham to compel respondent as justice of the peace to grant a jury trial. From an order, Clayton Parks, Judge, denying relator's motion to vacate an order granting respondent's request and denying relator's request for judgment on the pleadings, and dismissing the writ, relator appealed. Appeal dismissed.

R.F. Schroeder, for appellant.

Edward K. Delaney, pro se.



Denied a jury trial by respondent, a justice of the peace, appellant brought mandamus to compel its allowance, asserting that all statutory precedents to a jury trial had been fulfilled. Upon the return day, the trial judge granted respondent's motion for judgment on the pleadings, denied a similar motion of appellant, and dismissed the alternative writ. The basis was that respondent's decision, being a judicial judgment, could not be questioned in a mandamus proceeding, but was open to attack only by appeal to the municipal court, where the alleged error could be reviewed. A motion to vacate this order was denied in a subsequent order, which also contained a clause quashing and dismissing the alternative writ.

The appeal must be dismissed. The first order made in this proceeding granted respondent's and denied appellant's motion for judgment on the pleadings and dismissed the alternative writ of mandamus. Such order is not appealable. State ex rel. Quale v. Penney, 144 Minn. 463, 174 N.W. 611. Ordinarily, an order denying a motion to vacate a nonappealable order does not acquire an appealable status. Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Mfg. Co. 44 Minn. 322, 46 N.W. 560; see Security State Bank v. Brecht, 150 Minn. 502, 504, 185 N.W. 1021. An order refusing to vacate an order granting judgment on the pleadings is within the general rule. Lockwood v. Bock, 46 Minn. 73, 48 N.W. 458.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney

Supreme Court of Minnesota
May 29, 1942
4 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 1942)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL. LOLA O. GRESHAM v. EDWARD K. DELANEY

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: May 29, 1942

Citations

4 N.W.2d 348 (Minn. 1942)
4 N.W.2d 348

Citing Cases

Winnetka Partners Ltd. v. Cty. of Hennepin

Finally, Hennepin County argues that an order dismissing an alternative writ of mandamus is not an appealable…

State ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney

PETERSON, JUSTICE. See State ex rel. Gresham v. Delaney, 212 Minn. 519, 4 N.W.2d 348. In a civil action…