From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex rel. Greene v. Lemon

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Nov 28, 1928
148 S.C. 98 (S.C. 1928)

Opinion

12532

November 28, 1928.

In the original jurisdiction, June, 1928. Petition granted.

Proceeding in quo warranto by the State, on the relation of G.W. Greene and others, to test rights of Mrs. Irene A. Lemon and others to office.

Messrs. R.C. Holman, and W.C. Wolfe, for petitioners.

Messrs. Thos. M. Boulware, and Solomon Blatt, for respondent, cite: 32 Stat. at Large, 555, not unconstitutional: 137 S.C. 496. Proper jurisdiction in Circuit Court here. Sec. 1, Rule 20, Sup. Ct. Rules; 95 S.C. 58. As to validity of Acts of de facto officers: 22 R.C.L., 601, Sec. 324; 134 A.S.R., 543; 35 A.S.R., 817.


November 28, 1928. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


This is a proceeding in the original jurisdiction of the Court in quo warranto for the purpose of testing the rights of the respondents "regents of the county poor farm of Barnwell County" to exercise the duties of the office to which they have been appointed by the Governor.

The respondents trace their authority to the Act of 1921 (32 Stat. 555), entitled:

"An Act to provide for the appointment of a committee of five persons, two of whom shall be ladies, to take charge of the County poorhouse and farm for Barnwell County."

The respondents in certain subsequent County supply bills have been referred to as the "regents of the poorhouse and farm," and as such have acted under the Act of 1921. The matter will be considered as if they had retained the title given them by the Act.

The contention of the petitioners is that the Act of 1921 is unconstitutional, for the reason that it is violative of the proviso in Article 1, § 11: "* * * The terms of all officers shall be for some specified period. * * *"

The Act of 1921 does not comply with this provision of the Constitution and is therefore void. The respondents, claiming under this act, are therefore without warrant of office and it is so declared.

The petitioners may apply to this Court for such orders as will carry into effect the views and conclusions herein announced.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WATTS and MESSRS. JUSTICES BLEASE, STABLER, and CARTER concur.


Summaries of

State ex rel. Greene v. Lemon

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Nov 28, 1928
148 S.C. 98 (S.C. 1928)
Case details for

State ex rel. Greene v. Lemon

Case Details

Full title:STATE EX REL GREENE ET AL. v. LEMON ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 28, 1928

Citations

148 S.C. 98 (S.C. 1928)
145 S.E. 704

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Coleman v. Lewis

Original proceeding, by permission, by the State of South Carolina, on the relation of W.A. Coleman, against…