From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State ex Rel. Florence v. Zitter

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 14, 2005
105 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2005)

Opinion

2005-0260.

March 14, 2005.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

In Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of prohibition and was considered in a manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of respondent's motion to dismiss or, alternatively, motion for summary judgment,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file her brief within 10 days after the filing of evidence; respondent shall file her brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 5 days after the filing of respondent's brief.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment be, and hereby are, denied.


Summaries of

State ex Rel. Florence v. Zitter

Supreme Court of Ohio
Mar 14, 2005
105 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2005)
Case details for

State ex Rel. Florence v. Zitter

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Florence v. Zitter

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Mar 14, 2005

Citations

105 Ohio St. 3d 1460 (Ohio 2005)
2005 Ohio 1038

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Florence v. Zitter

Ermal also requests a writ of prohibition to prevent Judge Zitter from (1) exercising jurisdiction in the…