From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State, ex Rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 12, 1989
44 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 1989)

Summary

converting workers compensation claimaints' original action from prohibition to mandamus where claimants had presented medical evidence uniformly indicating their condition had become permanent yet the Industrial Commission continued to issue only temporary total disability as a matter of policy

Summary of this case from Bunkley v. State

Opinion

Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312

Submitted March 28, 1989 —

Decided July 12, 1989.

Workers' compensation — Rehearing granted — Employer entitled to reimbursement from Surplus Fund under R.C. 4123.515, when — Temporary total compensation paid subsequent to permanency finding.

IN MANDAMUS and PROHIBITION.

APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, Nos. 86AP-1119 and 86AP-1120.

ON REHEARING.

Willacy LoPresti and Aubrey B. Willacy, for relator in case Nos. 87-622 and 87-1887.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Michael L. Squillace and Merl H. Wayman, for respondents, members of the Industrial Commission, and appellant, Industrial Commission, in case Nos. 87-622, 87-1887 and 88-205, respectively.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour Pease, Russell P. Herrold, Jr., and Robert A. Minor, in support of reimbursement in case No. 88-205, for amicus curiae Ohio Manufacturers' Association.


On authority of State, ex rel. Peabody Coal Co., v. Indus. Comm. (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 104, 541 N.E.2d 74, we hereby grant Surplus Fund reimbursement in case Nos. 87-622, 87-1887, 88-205 and 88-1312 for all amounts of temporary total compensation paid to the claimants herein subsequent to the respective findings of permanency.

Judgment accordingly.

MOYER, C.J., SWEENEY, HOLMES, DOUGLAS, WRIGHT, H. BROWN and RESNICK, JJ., concur.


I am pleased to see the majority of the court reverse itself and adopt the position set forth in my concurrence (joined in by Justice Sweeney) in the original decision in these cases as reported in State, ex rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster (1988), 40 Ohio St.3d 404, 416-417, 534 N.E.2d 46, 58. Obviously, I concur in the majority opinion.

SWEENEY, J., concurs in the foregoing concurring opinion.


Summaries of

State, ex Rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jul 12, 1989
44 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 1989)

converting workers compensation claimaints' original action from prohibition to mandamus where claimants had presented medical evidence uniformly indicating their condition had become permanent yet the Industrial Commission continued to issue only temporary total disability as a matter of policy

Summary of this case from Bunkley v. State
Case details for

State, ex Rel. Eaton Corp., v. Lancaster

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE, EX REL. EATON CORPORATION, v. LANCASTER ET AL. (TWO CASES.) THE…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jul 12, 1989

Citations

44 Ohio St. 3d 106 (Ohio 1989)
541 N.E.2d 64

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Chrysler Corp. v. Indus. Comm

Chrysler administratively appealed allowance of the new condition without success. This commission practice…

State ex Rel. v. Workers' Comp

Appellant argues, however, that it did not unilaterally terminate claimant's TTD based on Dr. Rand's report…