From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State Dept. of Health v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 3, 1969
53 N.J. 248 (N.J. 1969)

Opinion

Argued January 7, 1969 —

Decided February 3, 1969.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. James Hunter, III argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Archer, Greiner, Hunter Read, attorneys; Mr. Charles Lee Harp, Jr., on the brief).

Mr. Joseph A. Hoffman, First Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Mr. Stephen Skillman, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).


Subsequent to the entry of the orders appealed from, the defendant brought itself into sufficient compliance. Despite this, the plaintiff presses its contention that the orders were valid when made and were properly upheld in the Appellate Division, and that the defendant's appeal should therefore now be rejected. We agree and affirm for the reasons expressed by Judge Goldmann in his comprehensive opinion for the Appellate Division, reported at 100 N.J. Super. 366 ( App. Div. 1968).

Affirmed. For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, HALL and SCHETTINO — 5.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State Dept. of Health v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Feb 3, 1969
53 N.J. 248 (N.J. 1969)
Case details for

State Dept. of Health v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

Case Details

Full title:DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Feb 3, 1969

Citations

53 N.J. 248 (N.J. 1969)
250 A.2d 11

Citing Cases

Tp. of Cherry Hill v. N.J. Racing Comm

There have been numerous cases in New Jersey in which standards similar to the guiding language of N.J.S.A.…

Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan Agency

In addition, section 203(2) of the Law provides that the promulgation of rules and regulations by the agency…