Opinion
Submitted October 26, 1928 —
Decided February 4, 1929.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 6 N.J. Mis. R. 249.
For the respondent, Edward L. Katzenbach.
For the appellant, Nathan H. Berger.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CAMPBELL, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.