Summary
adopting the magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, which described the voluntary-cessation analysis as "forced at best" where plaintiffs "requested a discrete, one-time order akin to a mandatory injunction," not "an order for continuing relief" or an order "to protect them against affirmative conduct"
Summary of this case from McKay v. New YorkOpinion
Civil No. 06-6178-TC.
December 20, 2006
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on December 5, 2006. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.