From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Starker v. Trump Vill. Section 4, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 27, 2013
104 A.D.3d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-03-27

Oscar STARKER, appellant, v. TRUMP VILLAGE SECTION 4, INC., etc., et al., defendants, New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, et al., respondents.

Oscar Starker, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Laura R. Johnson of counsel), for respondents.


Oscar Starker, Brooklyn, N.Y., appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Michael S. Belohlavek and Laura R. Johnson of counsel), for respondents.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Saitta, J.), dated December 2, 2010, which granted the motion of the defendants New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and Commissioner of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them, without prejudice to the plaintiff commencing a claim in the Court of Claims.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Claims for damages against State agencies, officers, and departments in their official capacity, where the matter is, in reality, one against the State, i.e., where the State is the real party in interest, can be prosecuted only in the Court of Claims ( see Morell v. Balasubramanian, 70 N.Y.2d 297, 300, 520 N.Y.S.2d 530, 514 N.E.2d 1101;Power Cooling v. State Univ. of N.Y., 284 A.D.2d 317, 725 N.Y.S.2d 887; Automated Ticket Sys. v. Quinn, 90 A.D.2d 738, 739, 455 N.Y.S.2d 799). Here, the Supreme Court properly directed dismissal of the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal and Commissioner of New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal without prejudice to the plaintiff commencing a claim in the Court of Claims.

Moreover, under the circumstances presented, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the plaintiff's request that the matter be transferred to the Court of Claims pursuant to CPLR 325(a) instead of being dismissed without prejudice.

BALKIN, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Starker v. Trump Vill. Section 4, Inc.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 27, 2013
104 A.D.3d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Starker v. Trump Vill. Section 4, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Oscar STARKER, appellant, v. TRUMP VILLAGE SECTION 4, INC., etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 27, 2013

Citations

104 A.D.3d 937 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
960 N.Y.S.2d 912
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 2068

Citing Cases

Starker v. Trump Vill. Section 4, Inc.

Essentially, the plaintiff alleged that, due to the improper maintenance and oversight of the waiting list…

Starker v. Trump Vill. Section 4, Inc.

Oscar STARKER, Appellant, v. TRUMP VILLAGE SECTION 4, INC., etc., et al., Defendants, New York State Division…