Summary
In Stark v. Barrett, 15 Cal. 361, the court, differing with the doctrine laid down in Connecticut and Vermont, and arguing strongly in favor of supporting as far as possible a grant of a specific portion of an estate held in common by one of the tenants in common, said: "Such grantees would acquire interests liable indeed to be destroyed by sales under the judgments, or the result of the legal proceedings, but, until such destruction, capable of being enforced against intruders and trespassers."
Summary of this case from Horgan v. BickertonOpinion
December, 1921.
Application denied, with ten dollars costs.