Opinion
Case No. 02-4008-SAC
December 19, 2002
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This Fair Housing Act case comes before the court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, filed November 27, 2002. No objection has been taken to the magistrate's report and recommendation.
A report and recommendation to which there has been no objection is taken as true and judged on the applicable law. See Campbell v. United States District Court for the Northern Dist. of California, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 879 (1974); see also Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167-68 (10th Cir.1991) (holding that "[i]n the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate's report under any standard it deems appropriate"). The district court has considerable judicial discretion in choosing what reliance to place on the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations . See Andrews v. Deland, 943 F.2d 1162, 1170 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 (1980)), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1110 (1992).
The court has made a full and complete review of the record and the issues, and hereby adopts the magistrate's report and recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is dismissed without prejudice for the corporate plaintiff's failure to retain counsel.