From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Staples v. Staples

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Oct 21, 1897
38 A. 497 (R.I. 1897)

Opinion

October 21, 1897.

PRESENT: Matteson, C.J., Stiness and Tillinghast, JJ.

When a mortgagor remains in the possession of the mortgaged premises for more than twenty years, without paying interest on the mortgage note, or recognizing it as an existing obligation, there is a presumption that the mortgage has been paid or released.

BILL IN EQUITY for an accounting under, and the foreclosure of, an unrecorded mortgage many years outstanding. Heard on pleadings and proofs.

Irving Champlin, for complainant.

James Tillinghast, William R. Tillinghast and Theodore F. Tillinghast, for respondents.


The testimony shows that the mortgagor has remained in possession of the mortgaged premises for more than twenty years, without the payment of interest, or a recognition by him of the mortgage as an existing obligation. These facts give rise to a presumption that the mortgage has been paid or released. 2 Jones Mort. 4 ed. §§ 1195, 1196. Consistently with this presumption, the respondent, Levi Staples, testifies that his mother, the mortgagee, forgave him the mortgage debt, and in this he is corroborated by the testimony of his wife, and also of his brother Charles. We think, therefore, that the bill must be dismissed with costs.


Summaries of

Staples v. Staples

Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE
Oct 21, 1897
38 A. 497 (R.I. 1897)
Case details for

Staples v. Staples

Case Details

Full title:HENRY STAPLES, Executor, vs. LEVI STAPLES et al

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island. PROVIDENCE

Date published: Oct 21, 1897

Citations

38 A. 497 (R.I. 1897)
20 R.I. 264

Citing Cases

Radican v. Radican

In Ballou v. Taylor, 14 R.I. p. 279, this court decided "That the remedy on the mortgage ordinarily remains…

Eddy v. Campbell

In that case Campbell had attached Mathewson's interest in the land in question, but his title under the…