From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stapler v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 19, 1927
112 So. 461 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)

Opinion

8 Div. 478.

April 19, 1927.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; W. W. Haralson, Judge.

Archie Stapler was convicted of bastardy, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Milo Moody, of Scottsboro, for appellant.

Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.

No briefs reached the Reporter.


The solicitor asked the prosecutrix if she told defendant about being pregnant. There was objection and exception to this question. The question was not answered responsively, and no motion was made to exclude the answer that was made. Presumably the defendant was satisfied with the answer.

It was competent to prove by prosecutrix that defendant carried her away about the time the child was born, as tending to prove an admission by the defendant that he was responsible for her condition.

The proof of the age of the prosecuting witness was relevant as part of the res gestæ.

For impeachment purposes it was relevant to prove that defendant had been convicted of a felony, but the question calling for this evidence was not answered, and hence in any event there was no injury.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Stapler v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 19, 1927
112 So. 461 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)
Case details for

Stapler v. State

Case Details

Full title:STAPLER v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 19, 1927

Citations

112 So. 461 (Ala. Crim. App. 1927)
112 So. 461

Citing Cases

Russell v. State

Defendant had made himself a witness, and evidence of such a conviction would have reflected upon his…

Ledbetter v. State

In passing, it should be noted that the following cases are also out of harmony with the view we now express.…